Just because others such as Bolivia are looking into it, doesn't make it utterly ridiculous Cass (Sunstein?) It's just another mechanism to regulate certain industries out of existence. Move to Bolivia.
|
Welcome to the Legal Forums!
Please Register For Free Now!
At the Legal Forums members stay up to date on what is legal, new laws and state laws. Legal Forum members can read about legal definitions, weird laws, legal rights, legal services and law answers. The Legal Forums have over 30,000+ Legal Forum members and 35,000+ Legal Forum posts! Please register on the Legal Forums for free today! Registration will give you full access to the Legal Forums and takes just a moment to complete. We welcome you to our Legal Forum community! Please Join Us Right Now! |
While granting legal rights to nature may strike some as a hippie-dippy sentiment, advocates say it’s actually a matter of good sense
More...
Just because others such as Bolivia are looking into it, doesn't make it utterly ridiculous Cass (Sunstein?) It's just another mechanism to regulate certain industries out of existence. Move to Bolivia.
Upon deep thought, I must agree with 2ndAmdmt. Law is well known as a mix of political pursuasion and legal precedence. Think about the equity courts we law graduates studied. Think about the "RAP" (rule against perpetuities). Think about the "rule" of Promissory Estoppel. Absolutely NO LOGIC but a rule we must follow.
If a contract is formed by an Offer, Acceptance & Consideration and Acceptance is by precedence or statute legal by banging one's head on the wall 4 times, then there is a contract. The banging is a legally operative action.
Soooo, I must suspect that by legal dictum, nature could be made to have rights on par with humans.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Members who have read Should nature have legal rights?