LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
"National unification Law" ("Anti-Secession Law") intellectual property rights case
Reply With QuoteI issue (XXXIII)
Chapter I "I issue (XXXII)" letters submitted
Chapter II "National unification Law" ("Anti-Secession Law") Intellectual Property Rights Case and the China Intellectual Property Rights Revolution
Chapter III "National unification Law" ("Anti-Secession Law") Intellectual Property Rights Case and the China Intellectual Property Rights Revolution related issues
Chapter IV November 2011
Chapter I "I issue (XXXII)" letters submitted
November 26, 2010 "I issue (XXXII)" letters (Chinese) Registered Mail(XA09398430021) submitted to the CPC Central Committee General Secretary Hu Jintao, Registered Mail(XA09398431321) submitted to the PRC State Council Premier Wen Jiabao, Registered Air Mail(RR841269686CN) submitted to the Central Committee of Chinese Kuomintang Chairman Ma Ying-jeou, Registered Air Mail(RR841269690CN) submitted to the HKSAR Chief Executive Donald Tsang and so on.
March 26, 2011 "I issue (XXXII)" letters (English) Registered Air Mail(RR837204030CN) submitted to the US President Barack Obama, Registered Air Mail(RR837204026CN) submitted to the French President Nicolas Sarkozy, Registered Air Mail(RR837204159CN) submitted to the British Prime Minister David Cameron, Registered Air Mail(RR837204043CN) submitted to the German Chancellor Angela Merkel, Registered Air Mail(RR837204057CN) submitted to the Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper and so on.
March 26, 2011 "I issue (XXXII)" letters (English) Registered Air Mail(RR837204065CN) submitted to the UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, Registered Air Mail(RR837204012CN ) submitted to the UN Human Rights High Commissioner Navanethem Pillay, Registered Air Mail(RR837204074CN) submitted to the UNESCO Director General Irina Bokova, Registered Air Mail(RR837204131CN) submitted to the WIPO Director General Francis Gurry, Registered Air Mail(RR837204145CN) submitted to the WTO Director General Pascal Lamy, Registered Air Mail(RR837204128CN) submitted to the ICJ Judge Rosalyn Higgins and so on.
I am as a physicist and a scholar also is a civilian population without any political status and economic status, personally witness the "National unification Law" ("Anti-Secession Law") Intellectual Property Rights Case event, the exact record, analysis; true and profoundly reflect the situation of the China intellectual property rights.
As we all know the "National unification Law" ("Anti-Secession Law") has a worldwide impact, "National unification Law" ("Anti-Secession Law") Intellectual Property Rights Case is an international intellectual property case.
"National unification Law" ("Anti-Secession Law") Intellectual Property Rights Case as an international intellectual property case, the fact is clear: 2002 January 28 I proposed the "National unification Law"; the evidence is conclusive: the letters evidence, the webpages evidence; the law is explicit: "Berne Convention", "Agreement on Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights".
"National unification Law" ("Anti-Secession Law") Intellectual Property Rights Case as an international intellectual property rights scandal case, in violation of the "Berne Convention", the "Agreement on Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights" and other international treaties provisions, in violation of the world people’s will and interests.
Governments of the world, United Nations organizations and other international organizations, on the one hand have the passive responsibility to clarify the facts; on the other hand have the initiative responsibility to clarify the facts fit with governments of the world, United Nations Organizations and other international organizations vigorously promote the cause of intellectual property rights and human rights.
"National unification Law" ("Anti-Secession Law") Intellectual Property Rights Case will lead to an important impact of the cause of the world intellectual property rights and human rights.
Chapter II "National unification Law" ("Anti-Secession Law") Intellectual Property Rights Case and the China Intellectual Property Rights Revolution
2011 is the 100th anniversary of the China Xinhai Revolution. China Xinhai Revolution got support and help from the countries in the world, the recent online discuss that Sun Yat-sen have a US nationality; there are also Sun Yat-sen was rescued kidnap stories in the UK.
China Xinhai Revolution overthrew the Qing dynasty monarchy authoritarian rule, also ended two thousand years feudal monarchy authoritarian rule in the China.
"The Revolution is not successful, comrades must struggle"; can be summarized the truth of China revolution in one sentence since the Xinhai Revolution? This is the Agrarian Revolution. The Agrarian Revolution achieves Sun Yat-sen ideal "land to the tiller".
If say the Xinhai Revolution is dominated by Chinese Kuomintang, that the Agrarian Revolution is dominated by the CPC. The CPC use western Marxism as revolutionary program. The Marxism was applied to china rural areas, changing land as capital of the feudal exploitation and oppression, to implement Agrarian Revolution. The CPC completed "Outline Land Law" in 1947 and took power in 1949; in 1978 Mainland reform and opening rural contract responsibility system sub-land to the home, also is continuation of the Agrarian Revolution, act as the Mainland provide important basis for modern development.
In 1949 Chinese Kuomintang retreated to Taiwan, recognize the importance of land issues, the land reform in Taiwan consolidate political power and provide important foundation as Taiwan's modern development.
In modern society two most important assets are land and intellectual property. Intellectual property have more profound meaning, on the one hand it is the specific property; on the other hand it is the form of property.
The core of feudal exploitation is land exploitation on the one hand, on the other hand is intellectual property exploitation, through denying intellectual property rights, the rulers occupy the people's tangible property and intangible property.
Can achieve the end of Qing Dynasty authoritarian rule without the Xinhai Revolution? Can achieve the land reform without the Agrarian Revolution? Qing rulers had its own reforms, but in order to safeguard their own interests, can not carry out thorough reform. In 1930 the Kuomintang government announced the "Land Law", but the Kuomintang rulers in order to safeguard their own interests also reluctant to carry out thorough land reform, was defeated in 1949.
"National unification Law" ("Anti-Secession Law") Intellectual Property Rights Case the reality is the same way, in order to safeguard their own interests to maximize, the rulers do not act according to law, did not comply with laws, trying to be clever, win popularity by hoodwinking the public.
June 15, 2011 the China National Radio reported: "Since the mid-1990s, beyond the ten thousand officials with RMB eight hundred billion fled abroad". Although someone say the estimate is low, someone say the estimate is high, but they are no further instructions. "Beyond the ten thousand officials with RMB eight hundred billion fled abroad" are conclusive data, reflecting the extent of corruption in China society today.
The historical merits of the Xinhai Revolution and Agrarian Revolution are no doubt. someone deliberate beautify the feudal autocratic rule, but look at the reality of China today will understand how the feudal rulers of fraud, corruption, exactions enslaving the people; will understand Sun Yat-sen, Mao Zedong of the reason for revolution.
If the feudal land system is more central than the feudal monarchy system on the feudal system, the feudal intellectual property rights system is more central than the feudal land system on the feudal system, the China Intellectual Property Rights Revolution are inevitable.
If the basic program of the China Agrarian Revolution is "land to the tiller", the basic program of the Intellectual Property Rights Revolution is "Author enjoys copyright", which also is the core of the modern intellectual property rights system.
Chapter III "National unification Law" ("Anti-Secession Law") Intellectual Property Rights Case and the China Intellectual Property Rights Revolution related issues
The first China Intellectual Property Rights Revolution contains profound meaning. The core of China’s feudal autocratic system is feudal intellectual property rights system; feudal intellectual property rights system is the feudalism specter, although regime change but they can be reincarnated. The core of feudal intellectual property rights system is no clear of intellectual property rights system, rulers control intellectual property rights. Feudal rulers not only control the specific intellectual property rights, also control the form of intellectual property rights, control a large number of tangible property and intangible property, are the truth of the feudal exploitation. The people were been tangible and intangible the exploitation and oppression rose up against it that was the downfall of dynasties.
"Author enjoys copyright" on the one hand is the specific text copyright; on the other hand is the abstract language and behavior copyright. Intellectual property rights itself are specific rights on the one hand; on the other hand any rights included the intellectual property rights, this is rights's copyright or rights's intellectual property rights form. "Author enjoys copyright", the specific copyrights have been guaranteed, further protect abstract copyrights and rights's copyrights; eliminating various forms of intellectual property rights fraud theft tangible property and intangible property.
The second intellectual property rights issue was no to solve the problem in China for thousands of years of feudal history; that is the reason of the downfall of the dynasty, also is the most important issue China today facing. Where is the fundamental difference between China and West? That is the intellectual property system and integrity system. In the West there is tangible intellectual property system and integrity system, there is also intangible intellectual property system and integrity system. In the China there is not intangible intellectual property system and integrity system, or say the China intangible intellectual property system and integrity system is based on the false Feudal Confucianism.
China Intellectual Property Rights Revolution will give the correct definition to the Feudal Confucianism of the roots of feudal intellectual property rights system. I have no objection Confucius; also I have no objection Confucianism. I think Confucius was a great man, but also Qin Shi Huang was a great man, Qin Shi Huang's many behaviors are serious offense by today's laws, similar Confucius's many behaviors are serious deviate by today's laws. Confucius and Confucianism serve as the oppression and enslaving the people of the tool by the feudal rulers, this is country from the prosperity to the decline the root cause. China Intellectual Property Rights Revolution is to oppose the infiltration of Feudal Confucianism to the state power, to oppose the infiltration of Feudal Confucianism to the law and judicature. Judicature independence means act according to law is independence, the judicature do not abide by the law is not independence, the judicature act can not beyond the law, the judicature is not above the law. Established a strict intellectual property rights system itself make the judicature can not be fraud, etc.
The third contemporary the CPC and the Chinese Kuomintang sought to fundamentally solve China’s problem; China Intellectual Property Rights Revolution to provide such an opportunity, to carry out through Intellectual Property Rights Revolution is the Chinese nation fundamental recovery road. Hope the CPC and the Chinese Kuomintang from the demise of the Qing Dynasty and from the Chinese Kuomintang did not implement thorough land reform and led to the failure in 1949 to learn lessons, carry out thorough reform of intellectual property rights in order to avoid regime change-style revolution. China have a saying: sailing against the current, do not move forward or back. China Intellectual Property Rights Revolution is with urgency.
China’s most famous classical book "Dream of Red Mansions" through the feudal family 'Jia' 'Shi' 'Xue' 'Wang' rise and fall, reveal the feudal society rise and fall history. The core content is Lin Daiyu death and Jia Baoyu to be a monk. Grandmother Jia and others on behalf of the feudal rulers want Jia Baoyu marry Xue Bao-chai was nothing wrong, but cheating said Jia Baoyu will marry Lin Daiyu, the feudal rulers to deceive was the greatest harm of Jia Baoyu and Lin Daiyu. "Dream of Red Mansions" revealed the feudal rulers through trick maximized their rights, denied the fundamental rights of the oppressed; it was inevitable decline. Ming Dynasty Emperor Chongzhen killed Yuan Chonghuan; in essence, the Emperor Chongzhen usurp the Yuan Chonghuan great achievements, soon the Ming Dynasty is died.
The fourth the intellectual property rights issue is the contemporary international community, UN organizations are most concerned one of the issues, the China intellectual property rights issue is the focus of international attention. China Intellectual Property Rights Revolution will establish the proper intellectual property rights system to settle intellectual property rights issue of international concern.
China Intellectual Property Revolution is the Xinhai Revolution and Agrarian Revolution to continue; is the component of the world intellectual property rights cause and human rights cause. "National unification Law" ("Anti-Secession Law") Intellectual Property Rights Case as starting point for China Intellectual Property Rights Revolution provides an opportunity to solve the problem.
Chapter IV November 2011
Based on "National unification Law" ("Anti-Secession Law") Intellectual Property Rights Case place a case on file for prosecution has been going on for four years and seven months and the unlawful facts.
Based on the rules of "Berne Convention", "Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights" and other international treaties.
Based on 2010 September 26, 2010 October 26, 2011 March 26, "National unification Law" ("Anti-Secession Law") Intellectual Property Rights Case letters submitted to the US President Barack Obama, submitted to the French President Nicolas Sarkozy, submitted to the British Prime Minister David Cameron, submitted to the German Chancellor Angela Merkel, submitted to the Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, submitted to the UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, submitted to the UN Human Rights High Commissioner Navanethem Pillay, submitted to the UNESCO Director General Irina Bokova, submitted to the WIPO Director General Francis Gurry, submitted to the WTO Director General Pascal Lamy, submitted to the ICJ Judge Rosalyn Higgins.
In November 2011 I am going to go to Cannes, France to submit documents to the G20 summit; afterwards to Geneva, Switzerland to submit documents to the WIPO Director General, the WTO Director General, the UN Human Rights High Commissioner, the ILO Director General.
As we all know the France is creative nation, "Berne Convention" is the French writer Victor Hugo and others initiated to set up. I have a deep friendship with France, in September 2000 the valuable "sequel the unification of physics" manuscripts gave to the responsable du bureau CNRS de Pekin Antoine Mynard, in September 2001 published "Sequel of the Unification of Physics"("The Development of Physics ") also sent to the French Ambassador to China and Mr.Mynard; in January 2002 Mr. Mynard replied letter and expressed gratitude on behalf of Ambassador. As we all know the G8 summit and the G20 summit, the French Government is committed to public participation. Intellectual property rights issue is important topic of contemporary human society, the China intellectual property rights issue is more important topic. "National unification Law" ("Anti-Secession Law") Intellectual Property Rights Case offered china’s real and exact situation as well as the method of solving the problem. No doubt, it is great significance to contemporary human society. Also I am going to go to Germany, Britain, the United States, Canada and other countries or regions, introduce the truth of the "National unification Law" ("Anti-Secession Law") Intellectual Property Rights Case.
I hope the governments in the world to provide some costs of intellectual property rights, to support the struggle of maintaining the international intellectual property rights treaties.
It is the real pressing issue to raise funds to visit France, Switzerland. In order to facilitate the insight people to provide funds I provide the support and help account (China Postal Savings Bank account 6221882210000048326, China Merchants Bank account 6225880243978690).
My core identity is a physicist, I found the Matter Weak Field and established the Theory of the Matter Weak Field; I established the Super-Molecule Chemical Physics. The physics is my eternal cause.
As a scholar, I established the Uni-ence, Uni-ence and science are complementing each other of the thinking way and the research method; I established the Morphological Economics; I established the Theory of Micro-vibration (Morphological Psychology).
I born in 1969 AD, 42 years old; I am single, live alone and have nothing. A substantial amount of time use for academic, can be said a week work seven days and a day's work 24 hours. My works are not over four hundred thousand words. I can say every word contained my painstaking effort. I have completely intellectual property rights with my works. I will introduce my physics achievements and related achievements to the world countries.
Li Wenli
July 23, 2011
Name: Li Wenli
Address: No. 22-1-131, Quanyuan San Lu, Shenyang City, PRC
Postcode: 110015
Tel: 86-24-24261716
Email: friendliwenli@hotmail.com
Homepage: http://zhggongmin.wordpress.com
http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/2011602880
